The following guidelines have been found to be useful when producing data requirements:
Data requirements can be specified in numerous forms,
each of which has its own advantages and disadvantages:
Logical Data Models such as ERA diagrams:
Advantages:
Standard notations (e.g., ERA diagrams, UML, OMT) exist that simplify communication and understanding.
Logical data models can be easily transformed into physical data models during the production of
the data (information) architectures.
Logical data models are relatively precise.
Logical data models are relatively easy to evaluate for completeness.
Disadvantages:
Logical data models tend to imply a relational database implementation.
It is easy for experts to include design information (e.g., by normalization).
It is not easy to identify all data types.
Without significant training, customer and user representatives find the models difficult to
understand, especially their consequences.
Essential Business Object Models:
Advantages:
TBD.
Disadvantages:
TBD.
Data Dictionaries:
Advantages:
TBD.
Disadvantages:
TBD.
Data Expressions such as XML Data Type Definitions (DTDs) or Backus-Naur Form (BNF) formulas:
Advantages:
TBD.
Disadvantages:
TBD.
Simple User Interface Prototypes showing the visible input and output data:
Advantages:
TBD.
Disadvantages:
TBD.
Informal Lists of Text:
Advantages:
TBD.
Disadvantages:
TBD.
Data requirements should not be unnecessarily specified in terms of
architectural, design, or implementation constraints on the data:
Data requirements should neither assume nor mandate the existence of databases or of the specific types of
databases (e.g., relational or object) to be used. These are either architectural decisions or architectural
constraints.
Data requirements should only address mandatory, visible data.
Data requirements should only address content and semantics, not format. The format of data is either a data
design decision, a constraint on a data component, or an external API requirement.