Evaluates the implementation of the centers’ architectures for technical quality and conformance.
Database Administrator,
who evaluates the data components of the center(s) for technical quality and
conformance with their system and software architectures.
Network Administrator, who
evaluates the center(s) for technical quality and
conformance with the network aspects of their system and software architectures.
Quality Engineer,
who evaluates the centers for conformance for the project process and to their relevant conventions.
Reuse Librarian,
who evaluates the reuse center(s) for technical quality and
conformance with their system and software architectures.
Security Analyst,
who evaluates the center(s) for technical quality and
conformance with their security requirements.
Systems Administrator,
who evaluates the data center(s) for technical quality and
conformance with their system and software architectures.
Usability Engineer,
who evaluates the center(s) for usability by their stakeholders.
User Support Agent,
who evaluates the contact center(s) for technical quality and
conformance with their system and software architectures.
Quality Engineer,
who evaluates the work products for quality and conformance to the endeavor process and relevant conventions.
The membership of a center evaluation team will vary depending on the type of center being evaluated.
Evaluations should not devolve into walkthroughs that require the work products’ developers
to explain them to the evaluators. The work products should stand on their own.
To the extent practical, the developers of a work product should:
Not be the only evaluators of it.
Also informally inspect it prior to the evaluation.
A single person may play multiple roles on an evaluation team if
he or she has the necessary expertise to fulfill multiple roles.
This is especially true on small endeavors.